Continuous document assessment against the criteria that matter. Every finding cited to the exact paragraph. Your team reviews and challenges with a full audit trail — the Document Truth Test for your programme.
You're accountable for a programme worth hundreds of millions. But the information you use to make decisions has been summarised, interpreted, and sometimes softened before it reaches you. Highlight reports are subjective. RAG ratings get negotiated. Risks get parked.
The documents tell the real story. Contract performance, delivery milestones, financial forecasts, risk registers, benefits trackers — the truth is in there. But nobody has time to read everything, cross-reference the detail, and spot what the reporting is missing.
So you rely on the team's version of reality. And when reality turns out to be different, you find out too late to do anything about it.
Every assessment criterion runs through an 8-step pipeline designed for auditability — not speed. The system retrieves evidence two ways, checks its own retrieval quality, decomposes complex questions into binary checks, scores deterministically, verifies every citation against the source document, and critiques its own reasoning before producing a rating.
For high-stakes criteria, the extended tier adds multi-persona debate — three AI specialists independently assess the same evidence and flag disagreements for human review — and cross-criterion validation that catches contradictions across your full assessment.
The platform reads your programme documentation and produces an independent health assessment. Not based on what people tell you — based on what the documents say. Delivery progress, contract compliance, financial position, risk exposure, benefits tracking.
The monthly performance report shows KPI failures on 4 of 7 service levels for two consecutive periods. The contract allows termination after three consecutive failures, but the risk register does not reflect this exposure.
Cumulative spend is 18% above the approved budget profile at Q3. The latest financial summary references "re-phasing" but the change control register shows no approved change to the baseline.
Connect your SharePoint document library. Every time a document is updated, the platform re-assesses and updates your health score. You see the trend, not just a snapshot. If things are drifting, you know weeks before it hits the board report.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| You rely on what people tell you | You see what the documents actually say |
| RAG ratings are negotiated in meetings | RAG ratings are evidence-based with citations |
| Problems surface at board level | Problems surface when documents change |
| Contract risks hidden in schedules nobody reads | Contract exposure flagged with specific clauses |
| Quarterly health check from a consultant | Continuous health assessment from your own documents |
Link your SharePoint folder or upload directly. Business cases, contracts, risk registers, financial reports, delivery plans — the platform ingests your full document suite.
The platform reads, cross-references, and assesses your documents against delivery, financial, contract, and risk indicators. Every finding cites the source.
Your dashboard shows programme health by area — delivery, contracts, finance, risk, benefits. RAG ratings based on evidence, not opinion. Drill into any finding to see exactly where it came from.
When documents update, the health score updates. The 30-day trend shows whether things are improving or drifting. You see problems forming, not just problems that have arrived.
Programme failures rarely happen overnight. They accumulate — a contract issue here, a budget variance there, a risk that should have been escalated three months ago. By the time they're visible at board level, the options for fixing them have narrowed.
The SRO is personally accountable. The question isn't whether the information existed — it's whether anyone connected the dots in time. That's what this platform does.
Scale your gateway review practice without scaling headcount. Same rigour, faster turnaround, evidence your clients can trust.
Learn moreAssess your documentation against all 218 IPA gateway criteria. Evidence-cited findings across the Five Case Model before reviewers arrive.
Learn more90 days. Your programme. Your documents. We'll show you what the platform finds that your current reporting doesn't. If it delivers, the pilot fee credits 100% toward your annual subscription.
Book a Conversation